Comments on: Standards Diagram for Content Management http://blog.technologyofcontent.com/2010/01/standards-diagram/ Ramblings on the technology of content management Tue, 30 Aug 2011 15:38:33 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: uberVU - social comments http://blog.technologyofcontent.com/2010/01/standards-diagram/comment-page-1/#comment-3607 uberVU - social comments Thu, 21 Jan 2010 10:30:51 +0000 http://blog.technologyofcontent.com/?p=191#comment-3607 <p><strong>Social comments and analytics for this post...</strong></p> <p>This post was mentioned on Twitter by justincormack: Ok here is a (beta) open standards in content management #prezi diagram for @McBoof (and @janusboye) http://bit.ly/4L794l...</p> Social comments and analytics for this post…

This post was mentioned on Twitter by justincormack: Ok here is a (beta) open standards in content management #prezi diagram for @McBoof (and @janusboye) http://bit.ly/4L794l…

]]> By: Tweets that mention Standards Diagram for Content Management – Technology of Content -- Topsy.com http://blog.technologyofcontent.com/2010/01/standards-diagram/comment-page-1/#comment-3420 Tweets that mention Standards Diagram for Content Management – Technology of Content -- Topsy.com Thu, 14 Jan 2010 00:39:10 +0000 http://blog.technologyofcontent.com/?p=191#comment-3420 <p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Esther Rudolph, Justin Cormack. Justin Cormack said: Ok here is a (beta) open standards in content management #prezi diagram for @McBoof (and @janusboye) http://bit.ly/4L794l [...]</p> [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Esther Rudolph, Justin Cormack. Justin Cormack said: Ok here is a (beta) open standards in content management #prezi diagram for @McBoof (and @janusboye) http://bit.ly/4L794l [...]

]]> By: Justin Cormack http://blog.technologyofcontent.com/2010/01/standards-diagram/comment-page-1/#comment-3393 Justin Cormack Wed, 13 Jan 2010 11:00:58 +0000 http://blog.technologyofcontent.com/?p=191#comment-3393 <p>I havent worked out colour in Prezi yet, other than adding images. Looks like text colouring not there yet. I wanted to colour the standards by the organization that does them, I might see if I can drop images under them to do that.</p> <p>I think "Blowing in the WInd" might go with it, but I havent decided.</p> <p>Need to work out how to do the other set of transforms, on paths in Prezi too...</p> I havent worked out colour in Prezi yet, other than adding images. Looks like text colouring not there yet. I wanted to colour the standards by the organization that does them, I might see if I can drop images under them to do that.

I think “Blowing in the WInd” might go with it, but I havent decided.

Need to work out how to do the other set of transforms, on paths in Prezi too…

]]> By: Jon Marks http://blog.technologyofcontent.com/2010/01/standards-diagram/comment-page-1/#comment-3391 Jon Marks Wed, 13 Jan 2010 10:19:03 +0000 http://blog.technologyofcontent.com/?p=191#comment-3391 <p>Nice one. I agree that OSGi probably doesn't fit in here either. But it's cool. Needs a bit more colour and Bob Dylan though ...</p> Nice one. I agree that OSGi probably doesn’t fit in here either. But it’s cool. Needs a bit more colour and Bob Dylan though …

]]> By: justin http://blog.technologyofcontent.com/2010/01/standards-diagram/comment-page-1/#comment-3389 justin Wed, 13 Jan 2010 08:10:19 +0000 http://blog.technologyofcontent.com/?p=191#comment-3389 <p>Yes, I tend to agree, all the bits around implementation, which OSGI is, don't really fit here the way it is structured.</p> Yes, I tend to agree, all the bits around implementation, which OSGI is, don’t really fit here the way it is structured.

]]> By: Bertrand Delacretaz http://blog.technologyofcontent.com/2010/01/standards-diagram/comment-page-1/#comment-3387 Bertrand Delacretaz Wed, 13 Jan 2010 07:46:32 +0000 http://blog.technologyofcontent.com/?p=191#comment-3387 <p>I don't think I would add OSGi to this diagram - it is a very important standard (and I'm a big fan ot if) if your content management infrastructure is based on Java, but one could argue that it's an implementation "detail".</p> <p>Maybe creating another diagram about Java standards that are important in content management would be more appropriate if you want to include it? I like the way the current diagram is implementation-agnostic.</p> I don’t think I would add OSGi to this diagram – it is a very important standard (and I’m a big fan ot if) if your content management infrastructure is based on Java, but one could argue that it’s an implementation “detail”.

Maybe creating another diagram about Java standards that are important in content management would be more appropriate if you want to include it? I like the way the current diagram is implementation-agnostic.

]]>