Comments on: Open source and Content Management (for Janus Boye) http://blog.technologyofcontent.com/2010/01/open-source-and-content-management-for-janus-boye/ Ramblings on the technology of content management Tue, 30 Aug 2011 15:38:33 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: open source content management - StartTags.com http://blog.technologyofcontent.com/2010/01/open-source-and-content-management-for-janus-boye/comment-page-1/#comment-3854 open source content management - StartTags.com Wed, 27 Jan 2010 00:03:45 +0000 http://blog.technologyofcontent.com/?p=186#comment-3854 <p>[...] provides a complete web site content management system. Web-based administration allows for easy ...Open source and Content Management (for Janus Boye ...Now I only spoke to him very briefly before he had to rush to the airport, but hopefully the [...]</p> [...] provides a complete web site content management system. Web-based administration allows for easy …Open source and Content Management (for Janus Boye …Now I only spoke to him very briefly before he had to rush to the airport, but hopefully the [...]

]]> By: Most Tweeted Articles by CMS Experts: MrTweet http://blog.technologyofcontent.com/2010/01/open-source-and-content-management-for-janus-boye/comment-page-1/#comment-3364 Most Tweeted Articles by CMS Experts: MrTweet Tue, 12 Jan 2010 10:17:11 +0000 http://blog.technologyofcontent.com/?p=186#comment-3364 <p><strong>Your article was most tweeted by CMS experts in the Twitterverse...</strong></p> <p>Come see other top popular articles surfaced by CMS experts!...</p> Your article was most tweeted by CMS experts in the Twitterverse…

Come see other top popular articles surfaced by CMS experts!…

]]> By: Justin Cormack http://blog.technologyofcontent.com/2010/01/open-source-and-content-management-for-janus-boye/comment-page-1/#comment-3333 Justin Cormack Mon, 11 Jan 2010 13:47:11 +0000 http://blog.technologyofcontent.com/?p=186#comment-3333 <p>I think JCR and CMIS show what is going to happen with vendors and open source as the industry moves forwards to more standards based platforms; you are right that from the end user level they may not be important to everyone. In a technical sense, standards have generally come late to content management (although Jon's post highlights a lot of those we have, very few are content management specific). I will post my diagrammized take on which standards matter soon...</p> <p>Microsoft is an interesting one; first they are extremely good at building developer community, much better than any other closed source vendor. They work really hard on it. The second is that Sharepoint is a very much a platform not a product, far more than every other vendor's product lines are. Platforms are much easier to build communities around, and that is also where Mincrosoft's community expertise is. Drupal is probably the next most platformy product, and the community around that is also very strong. We are starting to see the beginnings of a response to this from content management vendors (in the Java sphere Day seems to be pushing a platformization based on the Java standards for example), and there will be much more of this too going forward I believe.</p> I think JCR and CMIS show what is going to happen with vendors and open source as the industry moves forwards to more standards based platforms; you are right that from the end user level they may not be important to everyone. In a technical sense, standards have generally come late to content management (although Jon’s post highlights a lot of those we have, very few are content management specific). I will post my diagrammized take on which standards matter soon…

Microsoft is an interesting one; first they are extremely good at building developer community, much better than any other closed source vendor. They work really hard on it. The second is that Sharepoint is a very much a platform not a product, far more than every other vendor’s product lines are. Platforms are much easier to build communities around, and that is also where Mincrosoft’s community expertise is. Drupal is probably the next most platformy product, and the community around that is also very strong. We are starting to see the beginnings of a response to this from content management vendors (in the Java sphere Day seems to be pushing a platformization based on the Java standards for example), and there will be much more of this too going forward I believe.

]]> By: Janus Boye http://blog.technologyofcontent.com/2010/01/open-source-and-content-management-for-janus-boye/comment-page-1/#comment-3323 Janus Boye Sun, 10 Jan 2010 22:41:05 +0000 http://blog.technologyofcontent.com/?p=186#comment-3323 <p>Thank you very much for taking the time to update me on open source and standards. I very much appreciate it. It is interesting that you highlight JCR and CMIS as standards. We can probably easily agree that all JCR standards have limited value to those not living in Java world. For CMIS, we can probably also agree that it is not a standard yet and even if it was, it is still too early for customers to adopt it. Almost all vendors have written promotional material on why web standards matter (e.g. http://www.squiz.co.uk/news-and-events/blog/posts/why-web-standards-matter), and I like the idea of standards too, but which ones ? I also like the idea of a community, but don't you agree that Microsoft has a much bigger and more vibrant community than most open source projects, at least within content management ?</p> Thank you very much for taking the time to update me on open source and standards. I very much appreciate it. It is interesting that you highlight JCR and CMIS as standards. We can probably easily agree that all JCR standards have limited value to those not living in Java world. For CMIS, we can probably also agree that it is not a standard yet and even if it was, it is still too early for customers to adopt it. Almost all vendors have written promotional material on why web standards matter (e.g. http://www.squiz.co.uk/news-and-events/blog/posts/why-web-standards-matter), and I like the idea of standards too, but which ones ? I also like the idea of a community, but don’t you agree that Microsoft has a much bigger and more vibrant community than most open source projects, at least within content management ?

]]> By: Open source and Content Management (for Janus Boye) – Technology … | Open Hacking http://blog.technologyofcontent.com/2010/01/open-source-and-content-management-for-janus-boye/comment-page-1/#comment-3317 Open source and Content Management (for Janus Boye) – Technology … | Open Hacking Sun, 10 Jan 2010 15:17:37 +0000 http://blog.technologyofcontent.com/?p=186#comment-3317 <p>[...] the original post here:  Open source and Content Management (for Janus Boye) – Technology … This entry was posted on Sunday, January 10th, 2010 at 8:45 am and is filed under Linux, [...]</p> [...] the original post here:  Open source and Content Management (for Janus Boye) – Technology … This entry was posted on Sunday, January 10th, 2010 at 8:45 am and is filed under Linux, [...]

]]> By: Jon Marks http://blog.technologyofcontent.com/2010/01/open-source-and-content-management-for-janus-boye/comment-page-1/#comment-3316 Jon Marks Sun, 10 Jan 2010 15:10:51 +0000 http://blog.technologyofcontent.com/?p=186#comment-3316 <p>Thank you kindly! At about the same time you answered Janus' question, I answered his other one on Open Standards. I made a start here, anyway: http://jonontech.com/2010/01/10/an-incomplete-directory-of-open-standards/</p> <p>Please add to it!</p> Thank you kindly! At about the same time you answered Janus’ question, I answered his other one on Open Standards. I made a start here, anyway: http://jonontech.com/2010/01/10/an-incomplete-directory-of-open-standards/

Please add to it!

]]>