http://blog.technologyofcontent.com/2009/12/the-bottom-10-things-of-2009/ Ramblings on the technology of content management Tue, 30 Aug 2011 15:38:33 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://blog.technologyofcontent.com/2009/12/the-bottom-10-things-of-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-10770 Towards a comparison of content repositories – Technology of Content Tue, 21 Sep 2010 20:44:54 +0000 http://blog.technologyofcontent.com/?p=180#comment-10770 <p>[...] WebDAV changed the HTTP data model to push it much more close to one traditional content model, supporting LOCK, RENAME, and TREE on top of HTTP, and an explicit property model independent of the resources in question. The property model is flat, with no STRUCTPROP although extending it is mentioned in the RFC, and no MULPROP. CLONE is allowed, as resources can have more than one URI. Updates to properties are not ATOMIC, as the PROPPATCH method can update some properties without others. The main HTTP resource is the body, which allows storage of one BINARY property, as the other properties are XML strings. This is pretty much the standard document management style set of properties. [...]</p> [...] WebDAV changed the HTTP data model to push it much more close to one traditional content model, supporting LOCK, RENAME, and TREE on top of HTTP, and an explicit property model independent of the resources in question. The property model is flat, with no STRUCTPROP although extending it is mentioned in the RFC, and no MULPROP. CLONE is allowed, as resources can have more than one URI. Updates to properties are not ATOMIC, as the PROPPATCH method can update some properties without others. The main HTTP resource is the body, which allows storage of one BINARY property, as the other properties are XML strings. This is pretty much the standard document management style set of properties. [...]

]]> http://blog.technologyofcontent.com/2009/12/the-bottom-10-things-of-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-3271 Bottom 10 Predictions for 2010 « The Content Curmudgeon Thu, 07 Jan 2010 06:32:15 +0000 http://blog.technologyofcontent.com/?p=180#comment-3271 <p>[...] on the worst things we’d seen during 2009.  While Justin wasted no time in submitting a great post on the topic, I blinked on or around December 15th and when I opened my eyes it was January 2010 already, so in [...]</p> [...] on the worst things we’d seen during 2009.  While Justin wasted no time in submitting a great post on the topic, I blinked on or around December 15th and when I opened my eyes it was January 2010 already, so in [...]

]]> http://blog.technologyofcontent.com/2009/12/the-bottom-10-things-of-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-3250 A new year, a new blog « The Content Curmudgeon Tue, 05 Jan 2010 23:10:31 +0000 http://blog.technologyofcontent.com/?p=180#comment-3250 <p>[...] my first act, I plan to (finally) fulfill a promise I made to Justin Cormack, outlining my bottom 10 predictions for 2010.  What else would you expect from a curmudgeon?  [...]</p> [...] my first act, I plan to (finally) fulfill a promise I made to Justin Cormack, outlining my bottom 10 predictions for 2010.  What else would you expect from a curmudgeon?  [...]

]]> http://blog.technologyofcontent.com/2009/12/the-bottom-10-things-of-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-3053 Tweets that mention The bottom 10 things of 2009 – Technology of Content -- Topsy.com Thu, 24 Dec 2009 13:15:02 +0000 http://blog.technologyofcontent.com/?p=180#comment-3053 <p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Justin Cormack, Justin Cormack. Justin Cormack said: Only got 9 things for my bottom 10 of the year http://bit.ly/6Iqcwb any ideas? (@pmonks hows yours coming on?) [...]</p> [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Justin Cormack, Justin Cormack. Justin Cormack said: Only got 9 things for my bottom 10 of the year http://bit.ly/6Iqcwb any ideas? (@pmonks hows yours coming on?) [...]

]]> http://blog.technologyofcontent.com/2009/12/the-bottom-10-things-of-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-3032 Yaron Y. Goland Wed, 23 Dec 2009 19:04:53 +0000 http://blog.technologyofcontent.com/?p=180#comment-3032 <p>Hum... getting congratulated for thoroughly documenting my screw ups... Um... thanks? :)</p> Hum… getting congratulated for thoroughly documenting my screw ups… Um… thanks?

]]>