Comments on: Social {space|media|policy} @Starbucks http://blog.technologyofcontent.com/2009/12/social-space-media-policy-starbucks/ Ramblings on the technology of content management Tue, 07 Sep 2010 23:49:49 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Tweets that mention Social {space|media|policy} @Starbucks – Technology of Content -- Topsy.com http://blog.technologyofcontent.com/2009/12/social-space-media-policy-starbucks/comment-page-1/#comment-2690 Tweets that mention Social {space|media|policy} @Starbucks – Technology of Content -- Topsy.com Mon, 07 Dec 2009 09:51:44 +0000 http://blog.technologyofcontent.com/?p=164#comment-2690 <p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Justin Cormack, Ivan Walsh. Ivan Walsh said: Why Starbucks may have 5,151,861 on Facebook buts don’t get social media! http://bit.ly/7i9Emm [...]</p> [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Justin Cormack, Ivan Walsh. Ivan Walsh said: Why Starbucks may have 5,151,861 on Facebook buts don’t get social media! http://bit.ly/7i9Emm [...]

]]> By: Keith http://blog.technologyofcontent.com/2009/12/social-space-media-policy-starbucks/comment-page-1/#comment-2680 Keith Sun, 06 Dec 2009 21:07:47 +0000 http://blog.technologyofcontent.com/?p=164#comment-2680 <p>90 percent of what people are paying for in a Starbucks is social atmosphere. The same cup of coffee cost a few cents to make at home or at the office. If the social atmosphere of a Starbucks is not conducive to photography, they should have skipped right past the free advertising on Yahoo/Flickr.</p> <p>In the event that some customer who saw the Flickr site gets arrested on some trumped up privacy complaint or sued by Starbucks own trademark lawyer for posting big photos of the product, the company should expect considerable ridicule with the likelihood of expensive apologies.</p> 90 percent of what people are paying for in a Starbucks is social atmosphere. The same cup of coffee cost a few cents to make at home or at the office. If the social atmosphere of a Starbucks is not conducive to photography, they should have skipped right past the free advertising on Yahoo/Flickr.

In the event that some customer who saw the Flickr site gets arrested on some trumped up privacy complaint or sued by Starbucks own trademark lawyer for posting big photos of the product, the company should expect considerable ridicule with the likelihood of expensive apologies.

]]>