<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Content microarchitecture: How I learned to love HTML part 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.technologyofcontent.com/2009/11/content-microarchitecture-how-i-learned-to-love-html-part-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.technologyofcontent.com/2009/11/content-microarchitecture-how-i-learned-to-love-html-part-2/</link>
	<description>Ramblings on the technology of content management</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2011 15:38:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: paradox1x</title>
		<link>http://blog.technologyofcontent.com/2009/11/content-microarchitecture-how-i-learned-to-love-html-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-3556</link>
		<dc:creator>paradox1x</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 20:58:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.technologyofcontent.com/?p=145#comment-3556</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;More from Daniel Jacobson on NPR&#039;s content management ecosystem...&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Programmable Web: Daniel Jacobson: &quot;Content Portability: Building an API is Not Enough&quot; Previous entries in the series: Programmable Web: Daniel......&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>More from Daniel Jacobson on NPR&#8217;s content management ecosystem&#8230;</strong></p>

<p>Programmable Web: Daniel Jacobson: &#8220;Content Portability: Building an API is Not Enough&#8221; Previous entries in the series: Programmable Web: Daniel&#8230;&#8230;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sorry, it&#8217;s too late to COPE &#171; CMSish</title>
		<link>http://blog.technologyofcontent.com/2009/11/content-microarchitecture-how-i-learned-to-love-html-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-2626</link>
		<dc:creator>Sorry, it&#8217;s too late to COPE &#171; CMSish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 13:22:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.technologyofcontent.com/?p=145#comment-2626</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] on the content storage strategy they&#8217;ve adopted for the U.S National Public Radio (via Justin Cormack). The basic  idea is to ensure hardcore content portability by very cleanly splitting out [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on the content storage strategy they&#8217;ve adopted for the U.S National Public Radio (via Justin Cormack). The basic  idea is to ensure hardcore content portability by very cleanly splitting out [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Jacobson</title>
		<link>http://blog.technologyofcontent.com/2009/11/content-microarchitecture-how-i-learned-to-love-html-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-2425</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Jacobson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 21:22:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.technologyofcontent.com/?p=145#comment-2425</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Justin,
Nice breakout on the five points of handling markup in text.  NPR&#039;s philosophy of COPE (coupled with our strategy for distribution) suggests that we should be storing our markup in a normalized way.  But as you point out in your fourth point, this decision may not be appropriate for other systems.  Making that decision requires a sound review of the business goals as well as an assessment of the technical architecture.  In some cases, implementing a normalized markup model will be very difficult and, if the distribution strategy is limited, that extra work would not realize dividends.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;As you emphasized, the decision to go one way or the other should be a calculated one.  My article hopefully demonstrates that there are other approaches and opportunities other than (what seems to be) the default approach of adding plug-ins that strip out the markup on distribution rather than storage.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Justin,
Nice breakout on the five points of handling markup in text.  NPR&#8217;s philosophy of COPE (coupled with our strategy for distribution) suggests that we should be storing our markup in a normalized way.  But as you point out in your fourth point, this decision may not be appropriate for other systems.  Making that decision requires a sound review of the business goals as well as an assessment of the technical architecture.  In some cases, implementing a normalized markup model will be very difficult and, if the distribution strategy is limited, that extra work would not realize dividends.</p>

<p>As you emphasized, the decision to go one way or the other should be a calculated one.  My article hopefully demonstrates that there are other approaches and opportunities other than (what seems to be) the default approach of adding plug-ins that strip out the markup on distribution rather than storage.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: blog.edge3.org

Served from: blog.technologyofcontent.com @ 2012-02-04 15:01:47 -->
