Comments on: CMS technology choices http://blog.technologyofcontent.com/2009/08/cms-technology-choices/ Ramblings on the technology of content management Tue, 07 Sep 2010 23:49:49 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: paradox1x http://blog.technologyofcontent.com/2009/08/cms-technology-choices/comment-page-1/#comment-1943 paradox1x Sun, 18 Oct 2009 12:42:22 +0000 http://blog.technologyofcontent.com/?p=33#comment-1943 <p><strong>On the future of CMS - CMS Links for October 18th, 2009 -...</strong></p> <p>There is a must read three part series from Justin Cormack who I think nails it and says it better......</p> On the future of CMS – CMS Links for October 18th, 2009 -…

There is a must read three part series from Justin Cormack who I think nails it and says it better……

]]> By: Content Enabled Vertical Applications and taking the CMS apart – Technology of Content http://blog.technologyofcontent.com/2009/08/cms-technology-choices/comment-page-1/#comment-1105 Content Enabled Vertical Applications and taking the CMS apart – Technology of Content Wed, 26 Aug 2009 23:00:32 +0000 http://blog.technologyofcontent.com/?p=33#comment-1105 <p>[...] is a second part of my response to Julian Wraith’s future of content management thread; the first part was more about the technical decisions, this one more about the architecture, and responding to [...]</p> [...] is a second part of my response to Julian Wraith’s future of content management thread; the first part was more about the technical decisions, this one more about the architecture, and responding to [...]

]]> By: Julian Wraith | The Future of Content Management, the follow up http://blog.technologyofcontent.com/2009/08/cms-technology-choices/comment-page-1/#comment-1057 Julian Wraith | The Future of Content Management, the follow up Tue, 25 Aug 2009 13:38:16 +0000 http://blog.technologyofcontent.com/?p=33#comment-1057 <p>[...] Technology of Content [...]</p> [...] Technology of Content [...]

]]> By: Twitted by jtcowen http://blog.technologyofcontent.com/2009/08/cms-technology-choices/comment-page-1/#comment-682 Twitted by jtcowen Fri, 07 Aug 2009 01:23:45 +0000 http://blog.technologyofcontent.com/?p=33#comment-682 <p>[...] This post was Twitted by jtcowen [...]</p> [...] This post was Twitted by jtcowen [...]

]]> By: Peter Monks http://blog.technologyofcontent.com/2009/08/cms-technology-choices/comment-page-1/#comment-680 Peter Monks Fri, 07 Aug 2009 00:55:34 +0000 http://blog.technologyofcontent.com/?p=33#comment-680 <p>I almost couldn't agree more, except regarding the point about URIs vs referential integrity. See <a href="http://blogs.alfresco.com/wp/pmonks/2009/08/07/the-future-of-cms-technologies/" rel="nofollow">my response</a> for more details.</p> I almost couldn’t agree more, except regarding the point about URIs vs referential integrity. See my response for more details.

]]> By: Peter Monks » Blog Archive » The Future of CMS Technologies http://blog.technologyofcontent.com/2009/08/cms-technology-choices/comment-page-1/#comment-679 Peter Monks » Blog Archive » The Future of CMS Technologies Fri, 07 Aug 2009 00:51:11 +0000 http://blog.technologyofcontent.com/?p=33#comment-679 <p>[...] a discussion entitled “The future of content management” that has kicked off a few interesting [...]</p> [...] a discussion entitled “The future of content management” that has kicked off a few interesting [...]

]]>